The real war is not between renewables and fossil fuels, no, the real war is between renewables and nuclear.
This is somewhat ironic, because nuclear is one of the lowest CO2 emitting energies we have and so, in theory, renewable promoters should be fully on board with nuclear, but this is obviously not the case.
The reasons are very simple:
1. Renewables need pairing fossil fuel power plants since solar and wind energy are intermittent and unreliable.
2. Even though, in theory, nuclear could be paired with renewables, it would make no sense whatsoever. Nuclear is better suited to produce 24/7 and besides adding renewables to a nuclear grid would increase CO2 emissions so it would be a lose-lose proposition (more expensive and higher emissions).
On the other hand, nuclear doesn't need renewables at all, what is more, they siphon funds that could have been better spent in additional nuclear capacity (if the objective is to reduce the CO2 intensity of a grid).
Thus, it is not surprising at all that renewable promoters spend inordinate amounts of effort attacking nuclear.
At the same time, it is not surprising either that nuclear promoters tend to attack renewables.
Yes, whether we like it or not, renewables and nuclear are "natural" enemies. Appeasement will not work. This war will only get worse as the penetration of both increases in the energy marketplace.
The result of this war is, and will continue to be, a more gradual replacement of fossil fuels vs. the scenario in which renewables are dumped and nuclear gets most of the alternative energy investment.
The message this war sends is that humanity is not really in a hurry to reduce CO2 emissions. As always, acts speak louder than words.
Feel free to add to the conversation in Twitter.