Greenie Awards



The energy / climate discourse has reached such advanced levels of absurdity that a group of reasonable persons has decided to present "achievement" awards mirrored on the Academy Awards.

The categories that we will be recognizing are listed below.

Please add to the conversation in Twitter using the following hashtag: #GreenieAwards

Feel free to:

   a) Propose more categories and
   b) Nominate whom you think should win in each category

Yes, all this is somewhat tongue in cheek but it is time to have some fun at the expense of the doom and gloomers.

Enjoy!

Categories:

  • "So called scientist of the year."
  • Most anti-scientific hashtag.
  • Most egregious death threat.
  • Best supporting logical fallacy.
  • Worst example of "professed" beliefs.
  • Silliest consensus claim.
  • Most tilted temperature chart.
  • Worst activist commercial.
  • Most egregiously tortured statistic.
  • Most unserious meme.
  • Worst publicity stunt.
  • Most destructive national leader.
  • Stupidest hashtag.
  • Most fallacious statement by an alleged scientist.
  • Most ridiculous activist
  • Worst NGO director.
  • Most destructive "climate" stunt.

The jury naming the "winners" in each category will be composed of:

@ImaBannedd
@intrepidwanders
@SlagOffTwits
@TANSTAAFL23
@doyleclan1
@luisbaram

The year is still young, so let's get to work, have some fun and help bring some sanity to the energy / climate discourse!

Remember to use the #GreenieAwards hashtag.

Thank you very much!







Comments

Irreverent1 said…
I am printing off the list, so I can watch out for deserving twits, er, I mean tweets"! ;-)

I really enjoy contests. I can hardly wait to see who the whiners, er, I mean "Winners", will be!!!
7/05/2015 8:13 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Starved for CO2

Image
This article is speculation, and yet, it is something to ponder about. During millions of years, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere had been dropping. Actually the drop had been quite dramatic between the late Jurassic (more than 2,000 ppm) to recent times (less than 400 ppm). This is no fine tuning, the difference is in the range of five to one. Important reserves of carbon in the form of ancient life remains had been trapped "forever" inside the Earth. These reserves were in the form of coal, oil and natural gas. No natural mechanism could pump back to the atmosphere those "forever" sequestered amounts of carbon. No natural mechanism...  but could the Earth naturally create unnatural occurrences to return to the biosphere that long lost carbon or, would the Earth itself slowly starve due to insufficient CO2 in the atmosphere? It was inconceivable for any plant or animal species of the time to actually extract billions of tons of ca
Read more

550.org

Image
We are launching an alternate organization to 350.org because we believe that just wishing for something to happen (in other words for the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere to go back to 350 ppm) is absurd in the light that we break a new CO2 emissions record every year. So, it makes no sense to invest time, effort and money in pursuing an impossible objective.  Let's state here in what we firmly believe: nobody alive today will ever see again 350 ppm. So, if not 350, where are we headed?  We are "easily" headed for 550 ppm, thus the name of our non-profit. Before we proceed further, let us state why we believe our non-profit will be more attractive than 350.org: We will not, ever, under any circumstances ask for donations. Hell, we won't even accept them even if somebody volunteers some money. We won't be dogmatic. We won't believe blindly in models, organizations (e.g. IPCC) or the Pope. We will strive to actually list
Read more

Going Solar

Image
Some people insist that solar PV has achieved "grid parity" but to claim this they obviously have to consider grid connected PV. The real cost of solar PV is masked when grid connected. In order to better understand the real cost of solar PV, let's make a simplified exercise here. What would be needed to go off grid? The following: Obviously, the solar PV panels. Storage batteries A gasoline electric generator (unless you plan to store heroic amounts of electricity, you would need the backup generator). We'll consider the following parameters in our installation (feel free to substitute your own numbers): Annual solar capacity factor: 18%. Cost of the PV installation (including inverters, installation, etc.): $3 per Watt. We'll use Tesla storage batteries (the 7kW version) at a cost of $6,000 including installation. Solar panel useful life: 20 years. Batteries useful life: 10 years. Annual electricity usage: 8,400 kWh. So, this ho
Read more